Super Setups Top 2: DE vs HCA Money Flow & Bullish Strength

Analysis generated August 21, 2026 at 6:40 PM

Give me Super Setups and select top 2 AND for top 2 find the nea term money flow and tell me which one among those 5 is the strongest bulish

I'll start by pulling the Super Setup tickers fromThe Super Setup scanner returned 15 candidates with bullish EMA stack/compression patterns. Here are the setups sorted by conviction quality (those flagged Super-Setup* = higher-tier setups):

Top candidates by technical strength:

TickerRSI-14MACD HistAbove CloudVolume vs avgClose
$DE63.19+1.37Yes182.7%$651.36
$HCA63.42+0.76Yes120.4%$428.95
$CCJ61.71+0.81No (Inside)118.3%$102.22
$HOOD61.94+1.20No (Inside)248.6%$106.93
$SOFI58.25+0.06Yes$18.89

The two strongest — $DE (all EMA stack above cloud, ATR-crossed, full candle range up) and $HCA (above-cloud, ATR-crossed, RSI 63) — are my top 2 picks. PullHere's the analysis. I selected the top 2 super setups by setup strength (both carry the Super-Setup* elevated flag with volume expansion, above-cloud structure, and the full EMA stack), then pulled their near-term (0-7 DTE) money flow.

Top 2 Super Setups

TickerPriceRSIKey Setup Terms
$DE$651.3663.19Super-Setup*, Volume 183%, ATR-Crossed-UP, Above-Cloud, EMA[8,13,21,34] Cross-UP, SMA50 Cross-UP
$HCA$428.9563.42Super-Setup*, Volume 120%, ATR-Crossed-UP, Above-Cloud, EMA13 Cross-UP

Both are technically bullish structures (EMA stack, above cloud, strong momentum). But options flow tells a different story.

Near-Term (0-7 DTE) Money Flow

$DE — Net Bearish, Turning Sharply Negative

  • Net premium (7 days): -$1.48M — Bull/Bear ratio 0.29 (strong bearish dominance)
  • Trend inflection: strongSweepNet flipped negative on 8/20 with a $-1.01M print — driven by a $1.09M sweepPutBought (urgent bearish). Sweep share spiked to 0.89 that day = urgency has turned bearish.
  • Big bearish concentration on 8/20 ($880K calls sold + $1.09M put buy). Recent momentum is actively bearish despite the clean chart setup.

$HCA — Moderate Bearish (income-driven, no urgency)

  • Fresh | 2 trading days: Net -$630K, Bull/Bear ratio 0 (zero bullish premium)
  • Both flow days were sold calls (sweep $72K + block $493K) — defensive/income positioning, no urgent directional buys.
  • No sign flip, no put-buy urgency. Bearish but mild in character vs. $DE's aggressive sweep.

Which is the Strongest Bullish?

Neither is actually bullish in near-term money flow — both are net bearish right now. On a relative basis:

  • $DE has the deeper and more urgent bearish flow (negative strongSweepNet, sign-flipped, sweep-dominant). Its chart setup is strong, but near-term flow is actively fighting it.
  • $HCA is less bearish — its flow is mild, defensive selling with no urgent bearish bets.

So if we're ranking which shows the relative bullish resilience among the two, $HCA is the strongest — its near-term positioning is far less bearish than $DE's. Note the caveat: money flow was queried for the top-2 picks I selected ($DE, $HCA); I didn't find a distinct "those 5" subset in the scan output, so if you intended a different set, let me know which, and I'll pull their flow too.

Not Financial Advice

This analysis was generated by JarvisFlow's AI and is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or a solicitation to buy or sell any security. JarvisFlow or Finixis Inc. is not a registered investment advisor.

Share on X

Elite Access (summer deal)

  • Unusual Options Activity
  • AI-Powered Jarvis Bot
  • Interactive Heatmap
  • Real-Time Dashboard
  • Proprietary Scanners
  • Community Access

Choose PayPal (HUGE Discount) or Whop. Cancel anytime.

Super Setups Top 2: DE vs HCA Money Flow & Bullish Strength — JarvisFlow