ASTS Options Flow Analysis: Money Flow vs UOA Explained With Real Trade Examples

Analysis generated August 22, 2026 at 2:44 PM

Explain me what is money flow and options flow analysis with an example of latest data on $ASTS

Explain me how I should be reading UOA with examples

Money Flow vs. Options Flow — Explained with $ASTS

The Concepts

Money Flow (options premium flow) aggregates all unusual options premium into crude buckets — bullish vs bearish — to answer "where is the smart money positioning?" Bullish = bought calls + sold puts; Bearish = bought puts + sold calls. Aggregate tells you direction and size. A time-series adds momentum — is bullish flow building or fading day over day.

Options Flow / UOA (Unusual Options Activity) is the same market at trade-level granularity: each sweep/block, its strike, expiration, side (bought/sold), urgency, and conviction. UOA tells you who is doing what and how confident they are. Money flow = the map; UOA = the individual footprints.


$ASTS Example — Aggregate Money Flow (8/7 – 8/21, 11 sessions)

Spot context (Latest daily close 8/21: $68.65): $25.3B market cap, beta 2.74, short float ~21.9% — a heavily-shorted, high-volatility name, so options flow here carries amplified meaning. Price is below its SMA50 ($70.5) and the Ichimoku cloud (span A ~$71-74), but above its short EMAs (8/13/21 ~$0.9- $56.5, Kijun $64), with MACD histogram positive = improving.

Window totals: Net bullish +$14.7M, bullish share 66.8% (bull/bear ratio 2.0).

ComponentAmountMeaning
Calls bought$7.6MDirectional bullish premium
Puts sold$21.6MBullish floor-selling (willing to buy at strike)
Puts bought$1.2MBearish hedging / speculation
Calls sold$13.3MOverhead cap / income pressure

Key nuance — the quality of that "66% bullish": This is mostly premium collection, not aggressive buying. Put sellers ($21.6M) + call sellers ($13.3M) own ~80% of the window's premium. Traders are selling downside — comfortable owning ASTS at $60-75 — and selling upside calls to fund it. True conviction buying (bought calls) is only $7.6M. A "67% bullish" headline would be misleading; the honest read is income/positioning around a range, with buyers stepping in at dips.

Trend shape (daily net premium, $K):

Read the shape:

  • 8/10 spike (+$11.1M, 82% bullish) — one monster day (~$12.8M sweep-sold puts). That's a floor-builder — someone aggressively selling puts below the market into strength.
  • 8/17 bearish day (-$1.1M, 76% bearish) — call selling dominated (blocks $973K). Overhead supply.
  • 8/20 odd ( +$1.5M, 71% bullish) — calling back up.
  • 8/21 (flat -$48K, ~52/48) — pause day. Both sides nearly even.

Most important trend flag: strongSweepNet (urgent call-buying minus urgent put-buying) stayed positive all 11 sessions — never flipped. The most urgent money never went net bearish once; even on the Aug 17 seller day, urgent flow was absent rather than short. That's a persistent bullish tilt beneath the chop.

Strike walls (today only):

  • $75C — biggest bought wall ($277K) vs spot ~$68.75 → upside target/magnet.
  • $70C — biggest sold wall ($362K) → the immediate overhead cap; dealers hedge by selling stock into strength → self-reinforcing resistance.
  • Cheapest put wall at $65P/$60P sold → floor positioning.

So options traders see it as: range $64–$75, biased to re-approach $75, with $70 as the speed bump.

How to Read UOA — The Framework

Never read a single field in isolation. The direction is NOT "calls = bullish". You combine 5 elements:

1. Action + Type (the only correct way to get direction):

  • Bought calls = bullish · Bought puts = bearish
  • Sold calls = bearish/neutral (capping) · Sold puts = bullish (floor/income)

2. Sweep vs Block: Sweep = broken across venues for speed, paid spread — urgency. Block = negotiated desk trade — institutional, less urgent. Rank sweep above block for short-term conviction.

3. Moneyness + DTE: Far OTM = speculative/far target; short-DTE OTM = catalyst bet; ITM long DTE = hedge or stock replacement; big ITM block = probably hedging, not a bet.

4. Size vs Open Interest: Size > OI = fresh new position (high signal). Size ≪ OI = adding/rolling/closing (management, low signal).

5. Repeats: Same strike+exp trading multiple times same day = systematic accumulation — stronger than any single trade.

Real examples from today's ASTS tape (8/21):

TradeThe read
300x $75C 9/18/26, Bought SWEEP @ $3.70, HIGH conviction, $111KAggressive near-term upside: ~$75 is 9% above spot, 4-week DTE, bought with urgency (swept). Clusters with the $277K $75C wall → $75 is the expressed target.
100x $70C 1/21/28, Sold BLOCK @ $29.50, $295K (largest trade)A 17-month-dated ATM call sale — collecting premium, likely shorting or capping a large position. Not bearish per se; income/hedge. This is why the $70C wall is bearish.
200x $75C 10/16/26, Sold sweep @ $108KUrgent short-dated call selling — shallow upside at $75. Bearish-leaning insurance via sweep = someone paid urgency to sell.
$140P 3/17/27, Sold twice (block + sweep, $104K total, REPEATING)Deep-ITM put selling repeated twice same day = systematic accumulation of a bullish floor $140 requires buy at $140 in Mar 2027. OI was tiny (15) → fresh position.
80x $115C 1/15/27, Bought block, HIGH, $35K (69% OTM)Cheap long-dated OTM LE from $68 spot to $115 - low-conviction cost = "lottery ticket" directional.
160x $75C 9/09/26, Bought block, HIGH, $30K (OI 349)NEW strike (size 160 vs OI ~349 total) — adding to a rising open interest = fresh retail/sm345-scale conviction from the bottom.

What today's UAO says as a whole: The tape is balanced (bearish $640K vs bullish $592K) — heavy sell-side pressure put/call at $70 and off-sell at $75; buy-side leans long the $75 recovery and deep put-selling into Mar-2027. Net: chop between $64–$70, with both sides positioning for an eventual push at $75, and no collapse in the urgent bought call camp.

One reading pitfall to avoid: today's two HIGHEST-premium sold calls (Jan'28 $70C $295K and Oct $75C $108K) look large but are SOLD — they're income/cap, not directional shorts. Premium ≠ direction — every time.


Final honesty check: money flow says "constructively bullish beneath a chop (66% bull share, positive sweep net all 11 days)"; the strike walls say "$70 is the resistance fight, $75 the drawn target"; UOA says real buying conviction is thin and concentrated in short-dated $75 calls + long-dated put sales. The trend is the signal; today is a pause within it.

Want me to drill into any single strike-expiry pair, or flash flow across the Technology sector for context on $ASTS?

Not Financial Advice

This analysis was generated by JarvisFlow's AI and is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or a solicitation to buy or sell any security. JarvisFlow or Finixis Inc. is not a registered investment advisor.

Share on X

Elite Access (summer deal)

  • Unusual Options Activity
  • AI-Powered Jarvis Bot
  • Interactive Heatmap
  • Real-Time Dashboard
  • Proprietary Scanners
  • Community Access

Choose PayPal (HUGE Discount) or Whop. Cancel anytime.

ASTS Options Flow Analysis: Money Flow vs UOA Explained With Real Trade Examples — JarvisFlow